Reading Comprehension- 2
The passage given below is followed by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.
As I said before, I do not think that the real reason why people accept religion has anything to do with argumentation. They accept religion on emotional grounds. One is often told that it is a very wrong thing to attack religion, because religion makes men virtuous. So I am told; I have not noticed it. You know, of course, the parody of that argument in Samuel Butler’s book, Erewhon Revisited. You will remember that in Erewhon there is a certain Higgs who arrives in a remote country, and after spending some time there he escapes from that country in a balloon. Twenty years later he comes back to that country and finds a new religion in which he is worshiped under the name of the “Sun Child,” and it is said that he ascended to heaven. He finds that the Feast of the Ascension is about to be celebrated, and he hears Professors Heroditus and Panopticon say to each other that they never set eyes on the man Higgs, and they hope they never will; but they are the high priests of the religion of the Sun Child. He is very indignant, and he comes up to them, and he says, “I am going to expose all this humbug and tell the people of Erewhon that it was only I, the man Higgs, and I went up in a balloon.” He was told, “You must not do that, because all the morals of this country are bound round this myth, and if they once know that you did not ascend into Heaven they will all become wicked”; and so he is persuaded of that and he goes quietly away.
That is the idea — that we should all be wicked if we did not hold to religion. It seems to me that the people who have held to it have been for the most part extremely wicked. You find this curious fact, that the more intense has been the religion of any period and the more profound has been the dogmatic belief, the greater has been the cruelty and the worse has been the state of affairs. In the so-called ages of faith, when men really did believe the Christian religion in all its completeness, there was the Inquisition, with all its tortures; there were millions of unfortunate women burned as witches; and there was every kind of cruelty practiced upon all sorts of people in the name of religion.
You find as you look around the world that every single bit of progress in humane feeling, every improvement in the criminal law, every step toward the diminution of war, every step toward better treatment of the colored races, or every mitigation of slavery, every moral progress that there has been in the world, has been consistently opposed by the organized churches of the world. I say quite deliberately that the Christian religion, as organized in its churches, has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world.
Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in hand. It is because fear is at the basis of those two things. In this world we can now begin a little to understand things, and a little to master them by help of science, which has forced its way step by step against religion, against its edifices, and against the opposition of all the old precepts. Science can help us to get over this craven fear in which mankind has lived for so many generations. Science can teach us no longer to look around for imaginary supports, no longer to invent allies in the sky, but rather to look to our own efforts here below to make this world a better place to live in, instead of the sort of place that the religion in all these centuries have made it.
1. The main purpose of the passage is to
A. show how adherence to the Christian religion has made people lead craven lives.
B. demonstrate how argumentation has little to do with why people accept religion.
C. inform the religious populace that its blind faith has led to unwarranted atrocities.
D. exhort people to reconsider their faith and practice a belief system that is in sync with science.
Solution: D. The author’s contention is that religion has its basis in fear and it is in our interest to overthrow this yoke of fear with the help of science and look to our own efforts to make this world a better place to live in.
A. The option is too narrow in scope (the author’s main focus is not Christianity but religion in general) and it misses out the author’s main conclusion.
B. The option is too narrow in scope.
C. The option is too narrow in scope.
2. Which of the following is true about Samuel Butler’s book, Erewhon Revisited?
I. It was not well received by the section of public that had a religious bent of mind.
II. Its message does not end with Higgs being persuaded that religion makes men virtuous.
III. It makes the point that people bound to a myth are prone to shun the path of the wicked.
A. I only.
B. II only.
C. I and III.
D. II and III.
Solution: B. Remember that the book is a parody and intends to satirize the idea that it ostensibly puts forth – that a myth, such as religion, keeps people from doing wicked things. Thus, its message is not encapsulated in its end but in the pervading intention of the author to satirize the proceedings.
I. No such detail is mentioned.
III. The book satirizes this very point.
3. The predominant rhetorical device in the third para is
A. anaphora.
B. alliteration.
C. onomatopoeia.
D. personification.
Solution: A. Anaphora is the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses/phrases. The word “every” is repeated in the third para for effect.
B. Alliteration is the occurrence of the same letter or sound at the beginning of adjacent or closely connected words.
C. Onomatopoeia is the formation of a word from a sound.
D. Personification is the attribution of a personal nature or human characteristics to something non-human.
4. The author of the passage is most likely to agree with which of the following?
I. It is possible to accept certain things on grounds that are not entirely emotional.
II. There would have been no cruelty in the world had there not been organized religion.
III. The preponderance of the Christian church can be viewed as the preponderance of dogma.
A. I only.
B. I and II.
C. I and III.
D. All of the above.
Solution: C.
I. The author clearly believes that it is possible to accept things on grounds that are not emotional. Refer to “Science can help us to get over this craven fear in which mankind has lived for so many generations. Science can teach us no longer to look around for imaginary supports, no longer to invent allies in the sky, but rather to look to our own efforts…” The author is exhorting a shift from blind faith in religion (based on fear) to a more rational outlook. III. The author says, “…the more intense has been the religion of any period and the more profound has been the dogmatic belief…” The preponderance (predominance) of the church would therefore mean the predominance of dogma.
II. The author makes/implies no such claim.


0 comments